Breaking the "Safe" Illusion : Why AI-Powered Police Cameras Threaten Your Privacy
By: Casey Cannady : technologist, traveler & unapologetic privacy hawk
The Rise of Invisible Surveillance
All across the U.S., cameras you barely notice are logging license plates, classifying vehicles, and silently building a dossier on everyday movement. These aren't just traffic cams anymore, they're automated license plate recognition (ALPR) systems, often owned by private startups like Flock Safety, not your local police department.
That means the images and data… where you shop, where you drove, even what's on your bumper… end up in a network controlled by corporations, not courts. Data that can be leased back to law enforcement, private businesses, or resold to data brokers.
Put simply >> your daily commute has become an entry in someone else's database!
When AI Gets It Wrong, People Pay the Price
These companies market "public safety," but the reality is messier… and sometimes dangerous.
- A Colorado family pulled over at gunpoint because an ALPR misread their plate (Colorado Sun ).
- A nurse handcuffed on the side of the road when a camera database flagged her car as stolen.
- Taxpayers footing multi-million dollar settlements when predictable "AI errors" ruin lives.
This isn't hypothetical "what if" fearmongering. It's happening now.
A Business Model Built on Your Data
Flock Safety's playbook looks less like community safety and more like Silicon Valley venture capitalism:
- Lease, don't sell: Police departments (and sometimes HOAs or retailers) rent cameras.
- Data rights: The company still owns and can profit from the data streams.
- Venture-backed scaling: Nearly half a billion dollars in investment, plus lobbying muscle.
If it feels like the surveillance tail wagging the public safety dog… it is.
From Hot Lists to Human Rights Problems
One of the most troubling features: the "Hot List." A person's car gets flagged, and every sighting triggers a police notification, no judge, no warrant. What the Supreme Court has said requires a warrant (24/7 GPS surveillance) now happens by corporate loophole.
This isn't just about traffic tickets. It cuts into Fourth Amendment protections, and opens doors to misuse: stalking an ex, tracking political opponents, enforcing private morality policing.
Big Data Makes Bigger Problems
Combine ALPR data with retail logs, social media breadcrumbs, and even your car manufacturer's driving data… and suddenly insurers, banks, and government agencies have a 360° view of your life.
This kind of profiling can:
- Raise your insurance premiums
- Affect your loan eligibility
- Decide if you're targeted in an immigration raid
And the scariest part? You never opted in.
Can We Fight Back? "Confusing the AI"
In the video that sparked this post, Benn Jordan shows how adversarial patterns; subtle visual designs invisible to humans but can make cameras misread or ignore license plates. Think of it like digital camouflage for the AI's "eyes."
The takeaway: it's possible to resist automated tracking. But it's likely not legal for everyday use. In most states, tampering with a license plate is itself illegal.
The bigger point Jordan makes, and I echo, is that citizens shouldn't need hacks and workarounds to protect basic privacy. The solution has to come from law, transparency, and regulation, not DIY evasions.
Why We Need Stronger Protections
The European Union already enforces GDPR, setting clear expectations about data collection, ownership, and consent. In the U.S., we're lagging behind while venture-backed surveillance rolls out neighborhood by neighborhood.
If we don't act soon:
- Surveillance creep will become normalized.
- Everyday privacy will become a luxury good.
- Tech errors will keep eroding trust in both AI and law enforcement.
Privacy is not a perk. It's a human right.
What You Can Do Today
- Stay informed. Don't ignore those small black boxes perched above intersections or store entrances.
- Ask questions. If your HOA, city, or store installs ALPRs, demand clarity: Who owns the data? How is it used?
- Support legislation. Push for GDPR-like protections in U.S. law.
- Protect your digital footprint. Limit what you share online. "Free" apps and retailers are often bigger trackers than the government.
- Build awareness. Talk with friends, clients, and communities about the risks. Awareness is the first firewall.
Final Thought
Technology itself isn't the enemy… opaque, profit-driven deployment is. As a technologist, I know we can build powerful tools that balance security with rights. But without transparency, oversight, and genuine consent, these cameras aren't safety devices. They're silent stalkers.
And we deserve better than living under their gaze.
Citations & References
- Colorado Sun: Aurora police lawsuit over ALPR errors
- EFF: License Plate Readers Exposed
- Washington Post: How retail giants track your data
- Benn Jordan's breakdown: Breaking the Creepy AI in Police Cameras
Want to discuss privacy and technology?
I'm always interested in connecting with fellow privacy advocates and technologists.
Get in Touch