Back to Blog

The Privacy Crisis: Surveillance Technology and Its Impact on American Cities

By: Casey Cannady : cybersecurity guru & privacy advocate

February 10, 2026
12 min read
Casey Michael Cannady
Updated September 13, 2026
PrivacySurveillancePolicy Analysis

TL;DR

ALPRs aren't just traffic cameras. They're surveillance machines that record every plate that passes, innocent drivers included, and build movement histories showing where you live, work, worship, and who you visit. EFF's analysis of Oakland's own data found the cameras concentrated in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color. Commercial plate databases sell sightings to lenders and insurers. And in December 2025, reporters watched themselves live on Flock cameras that were exposed to the open internet without a password. The debate keeps asking whether ALPRs catch criminals. The real question is who is tracking your every move, and who they sell it to.


Reframing the Privacy Debate

Everyone talks about privacy in abstract terms: “data protection,” “security,” “encryption protocols.” That's the sanitized, corporate-friendly version. The reality on American streets is far more invasive and discriminatory: who gets watched, who gets profiled, and who profits from your daily movements?

The conversation about automated license plate readers has been deliberately framed around “public safety” and “law enforcement efficiency.” That framing is the problem. If you only measure effectiveness in plates read and stolen cars recovered, you miss the more important question: what detailed records of your life are being built, and who gets to use them?

The real question: stop asking if ALPRs catch criminals. Start asking who's tracking your every move.


What ALPRs Are Sold As

Here's the “public safety” brochure version, from police departments and ALPR vendors:

  • Automated systems that scan plates to find stolen vehicles and support Amber Alerts.
  • Mounted on police cars, traffic lights, and utility poles for comprehensive coverage.
  • Integrated with law enforcement databases for real-time alerts.
  • “Force multipliers” that let police do more with fewer resources.

Read that and stop, and you get a story about safer streets. Look at what actually happens on the ground, and the picture changes fast.


What ALPRs Actually Enable

  • Everyone gets recorded. According to EFF's Street Level Surveillance project, ALPRs capture every plate that passes with location, date, and time, and in aggregate that data paints an intimate portrait of a driver's life.
  • Movement becomes a profile: where you live, work, shop, worship, and who you associate with.
  • Commercial databases sell it. Private plate-scanning networks built by repo and tow operators sell sightings to private buyers, and companies like Digital Recognition Network openly market that location data to lenders and insurers.
  • The security is often terrible. In December 2025, 404 Media, working with Benn Jordan and a security researcher, found Flock cameras exposed to the internet with no authentication. A reporter walked in front of them and watched himself on the livestream.

That's not “public safety.” That's commercialized surveillance infrastructure disguised as law enforcement equipment.


The Geographic Injustice Play

This is where the discrimination becomes impossible to ignore. When EFF analyzed raw ALPR data from the Oakland Police Department, it found the pattern you would fear:

  • Police disproportionately deployed ALPR-equipped vehicles in low-income communities and communities of color.
  • Drivers in neighborhoods with a higher density of white families were less likely to be captured.
  • The result: marginalized communities live under constant digital surveillance while affluent areas keep relative privacy.

That's not crime prevention. That's targeted surveillance. You don't need to be a privacy scholar to see it: the technology creates a two-tiered society where how closely you are tracked depends on where you can afford to live.


Meanwhile, the Safety Question Is a Distraction

Asking “do ALPRs make us safer?” is like asking whether the NSA's phone records program stopped terrorism. You're looking at the wrong output. The real scoreboard looks more like this:

DimensionWhat ALPRs are sold asWhat the evidence shows they enable
Data collectionTargeted law enforcement useIndiscriminate collection of innocent drivers' movements
Geographic equityEqual protection for all communitiesSurveillance concentrated in poor and minority neighborhoods
Data securityProtected law enforcement dataCameras exposed to the open internet without authentication
Commercial useA public safety toolPlate sightings sold to lenders, insurers, and other private buyers

The Technical Breakdown: How This Actually Works

As someone who has spent nearly 30 years building and securing enterprise data systems, here is what this surveillance architecture looks like:

The Surveillance Pipeline

  1. Collection layer: high-speed cameras scan every passing plate and create timestamped, location-tagged records.
  2. Storage layer: databases retain months or years of movement data, too often with weak security.
  3. Analysis layer: pattern detection identifies regular routes, frequent locations, and associations.
  4. Monetization layer: data is packaged and sold to commercial buyers with little transparency.
  5. Access layer: multiple organizations can query your movement patterns without your knowledge.

This isn't just “license plate reading.” It's a comprehensive movement tracking system that bypasses every ordinary concept of privacy and consent.


Why People Should Be Outraged

  • Your daily movements are recorded and stored without your consent or knowledge.
  • That data builds a profile of your life that can be used against you in countless ways.
  • The surveillance falls hardest on marginalized communities while wealthy areas stay relatively untouched.
  • Commercial companies profit from tracking you while selling “safety” to taxpayers.
  • None of this shows up in police press releases about stolen car recovery rates.

People should be furious not because these systems don't work, but because they work exactly as designed: as invasive surveillance infrastructure sold to the public as safety equipment.


The Call to Action

  1. Regulatory frameworks: strict laws governing ALPR collection, storage, and use, with meaningful penalties.
  2. Data destruction: mandatory deletion of non-hit plate data after a short retention period.
  3. Technical audits: independent security reviews of every deployed system, starting with whether it is reachable from the internet.
  4. Transparency reports: public disclosure of what is collected, how long it is kept, and who can search it.
  5. Public awareness: plain-language education about what is being collected and how it is used.

“Stop asking if ALPRs catch criminals. Start asking who's tracking your every move.”

Casey Cannady

This isn't about one surveillance technology. It's about building technical and legal guardrails that stop any future technology, whatever its claimed benefits, from becoming commercialized surveillance infrastructure. For the earlier half of this story, including the families held at gunpoint over plate misreads, see Breaking the “Safe” Illusion.


Sources & Further Reading

Sourcing note: facts about deployment, commercial data sales, and exposed cameras are linked to reporting and primary sources. The pipeline breakdown and the call to action are my own analysis. Revised September 2026: a dead ACLU link was replaced, the source video is now embedded, and every factual claim now has a citation.


Connect with Casey

Have a story, a question, or want Casey to write about a specific topic? DM me and tell me which story you want next.

Casey writes about privacy, surveillance, cybersecurity, nomadic life, and navigating the world as a late-diagnosed AuDHD adult. New posts drop on my professional website.